The Human Choice - 11


Evolutionists maintain that life originated in a primitive organic 'soup' by spontaneous generation. But widely known and acclaimed astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle and associate, Professor C. Wickramasinghe, in their 1981 book "Evolution from Space" say: ...there are about two thousand enzymes, and the chance of obtaining them all in a random trial is... an outrageously small probability that could not be faced even if the whole universe consisted of organic soup.

They go on to say of evolution theory: If one is not prejudiced either by social beliefs or by a scientific training into the conviction ... this simple calculation wipes the idea entirely out of court. End quote.

As astronomers these men are expert in mathematics.

So the second disproof of chance creation is that it is a mathematical impossibility. More on this later.


A third impassible barrier to chance creation is the fossil record. Despite years of extreme, might we say "frantic", effort to find "missing links", none have ever come to light.

For example: the fossil evidence has long been distressing to evolution theory because it does not show the gradual change of life forms that evolution requires. What it shows is that a series of complex life-forms have appeared as the earth has progressed from supplying the bare necessities of life to an ability to support life at the present level. As the environment for the support of life has changed, new life-forms have suddenly appeared. Many earlier life forms became specialised and then became extinct.

Life-forms change within their kind, none can be realistically shown to have changed gradually into new kinds of life-forms.

Evolutionists claim that the fossil record is incomplete and imply that it is just a matter of time. In fact, all strata since the earliest time of life have been searched and the evidence is conclusive that there are none of the evolutionary missing links that chance evolution requires.

This is not to say that everything is known of the fossil record, but definitely, that enough is known to eliminate gradual evolution as a scientific theory.


The struggle to play God and manipulate human life has caused incredible misery and millions of deaths, but no one bothers to ask if the creation belief on which this social engineering is based is valid or 'scientific' in any sense that those terms might be reasonably used. If anyone has brought the matter up then they have been carefully kept from explaining or exposing the situation in ways meaningful to the public.

Human manipulation is the only logical reason for teaching the evolution myth. The criminal purpose of these deadly social-engineering plans is the most obvious motive for this deceit. choice11.htm

.../Next Page

.../Back to Contents Page