One World Worship for All

Over the years nominal Christians have become complacent. They let down the bars on the fence of separation - and the goats came in. Australia's nominally Christian society enjoys all the civilizing benefits of the Gospel without participation in the Gospel Itself.

They want the blessings of Christianity, and the sensual pleasures of the world. Confessed non-Christians and anti-Christians in our midst are in the vast majority, and they hold the reigns of power.

Unknown to most Australians, the "Open Conspiracy" of Fabian socialist, HG Wells, is about to be fulfilled in a NWO. Our world and the curriculum of mainstream denominational churches is today dictated and administered by Pharisees, the mortal enemies of our Lord Jesus.

Their UN has embraced a Commission on Religion to assist in uniting the world in their NWO. "The New American", (April 3, 1998) quotes UN leaders' ideas on how to introduce "One-World Worship for all."

According to reports, the UN needs this paganism to justify their program of "sustainable development": their way of controlling the world's resources, depopulation, and enslaving us serfs. The plan is to force all nations into "Gaia Hypothesis". This "holds that earth is itself the deity we should worship, and the UN is the instrument through which the earth goddess will dictate our forms of devotion."

Webster's New World Dictionary defines Gaia as "earth personified as the Roman goddess, Tellus, the goddess of the earth". The "Gaia Atlas of Future Worlds" by Dr. Norman Myers, "adviser to the UN, WB, US State Department, and Rockefeller Fund," sets "forth the basic tenets of the Gaia religion."

They talk of earth as a goddess - appealing to feminists who don't want a male deity. Two thousand feminists at the WCC conference in Minneapolis in 1993, replaced Jesus Christ with Sophia, to depict the female aspect of the Father, and promote the one world worship of Gaia. Their publication appeals for dialogue with all religions to hasten victory.

Norman Myers calls for a "new humanism, a new world view, a new planetary concern" which requires "a UN ministry of religion." The "Futurist Magazine" (September-October 1994) says: "Religions are now headed toward what may eventually form a United Religions Organization, structured in much the same way as the UN, and sharing the same goals."

As Israel was not to be counted among the nations, God's people in this day are not to be counted among the denominations.

The report indicates these developments are on their way to fulfillment; and stresses creation of a "world ethic for living sustainably." This began in 1991.

"In the same year, globalist theologian Hans Kung was commissioned by UNESCO to create a 'Declaration of Global Ethic' which would impose a set of binding commitments upon religious leaders and institutions." To obtain this projected one-world worship, Kung insists that "traditional religions have an ethical obligation to cease to exist."

In his 1991 book, "Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic", Kung writes: "Any form of... church conservatism is to be rejected.. To put it bluntly: No regressive or repressive religion - whether Christian, Islamic, Jewish or whatever provenance - has a long-term future." . . . How about humanism?

This was the basis of "Brave New World", by homosexual drug-addict and City of London agent, Aldous Huxley, who introduced LSD into the USA on behalf of the clandestine Tavistok Institute, said to be responsible for the Port Arthur Massacre.

The totalitarian nature of all this is seen in Kung's insistence, "there'll be no room for religious diversity because, 'If ethics is to function for the well-being of all, it must be indivisible. The undivided world increasingly needs an undivided ethic.'" So he postulates, "Postmodern men and women need common values, goals, ideals, visions."

This report on "One World Worship", developed by the UN says, "The crusade on behalf of the 'Global Ethic' began in earnest on January 25, 1993" when "a colorful collection of religious leaders assembled around the 'Peace Altar' at the UN's Temple of Understanding to inaugurate the 'Year of Inter-religious Co-operation and Understanding.'" This unveiled the 1993 Parliament of World Religions, and scores of religious leaders signed the "Declaration of Global Ethics". Not one was a Christian. These UN religious developments are parallel to and combined with the WCC.

Be vigilant, for it's later than you think.

Global Ethics is a totalitarian one world religious association for a world-socialist society requiring the end of traditional religions. Gerald Barney, (of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America and a member of the ecological elite) told the Parliament that "the only alternative to the destruction of religion is the 'reinterpretation and even rejection of ancient traditions and assumptions.'" This is taking place in the Ecumenical Movement, which constantly speaks of the united world church and humanity.

According to Barney, "Five billion humans must prepare to die to 20th century ways of thinking and being... Every person must learn to think like earth, to act like earth, to be earth." Current emphasis on ecology with the observance of Earth Day on Lenin's birthday for the past 28 years, has as its underlying purpose, the establishment of a one-world worship.

"Barney was a contributor to the Global 2000 report for the Carter administration, a call for depopulation. (The "Global 2000 Report to the President", and "Global Future: A Time to Act" are political statements of intent on the part of such policy centers as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the IMF, to pursue policies that have resulted in the death of 170 million cited in the reports, but will result in the death of all but 1 billion people by the year 2050).

Did you know that the UN's Global Biodiversity Assessment (Cambridge University Press) calls for human population to be reduced to 1 or 2 billion by the next decade (GBA Section You didn't hear that on the news, did you? Read the Declaration Towards a Global Ethic. Learn the definition of what the UN calls a "hate crime". Then you'll know why you're not being told what's going on.

In anticipation of the Parliament of World Religions, Gerald Barney helped create an updated document entitled, "Global 2000 Revisited: What Shall We Do?" The appendix to that report contains an invitation for heads of state and religious leaders to convene in Thingvellir, Iceland, on January 1, 2000. There before a stone altar, they'd present handwritten covenants pledging loyalty to Gaia. This event would constitute what Barney calls "a ritual death to and giving up of the old 20th century and its ways of thinking and being."

The WCC and Ecumenical Movement are deeply involved. The report claims that: "following the 1993 Parliament of World Religions, 'Ecumenist religious leaders wasted no time or effort to define 'authentic' religious belief." And by December, 1994, a cabal of "dozens of prominent religious leaders joined former president of the WCC, Paulos Mar Gregorius, on the banks of the river Ganges". Here they composed a document urging spiritual "empowerment of the UN" and said, "The UN should have a 'Spiritual Cell' with highly evolved individuals of all religions and cultures. These highly evolved masters would be assisted by 'vast armies of spiritual adepts' who'd preside over multi-religious International Academies in every country of the world." This paganism is at the heart and soul of all secret organizations.

"Karon Singh, president of the UN's 'Temple of Understanding', and Father Louis Dolan, are among the organizers of the Parliament of World Religions. These foot soldiers of 'spiritual enlightenment' were joined by 1,200 religious and political officials from 52 countries." In "February 1994, 500 Christian and Jewish clergymen from 90 countries gathered in Jerusalem for the 'Religious Leadership in Secular Society' conference."

Do you see the reality of Revelation 3:20, where Christ foretold how in this day, He'd be put out of the church that bears His Name - rejected, knocking to get back in? Not one of these religions or ministers has a stitch of faith or understanding of God's Word.

The conference indicted "fundamentalism" as a global menace. Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, urged leaders of the three monotheistic religions to 'weed out the extremes' from their respective faiths. So much for what Anglicans think of those who hold to God's unchanging Word!

British Theosophist, Benjamin Creme, claims to speak on behalf of Lord Maitreya, whom he says is the Christ, and "is working with other members of the 'Spiritual Hierarchy' to bring about the consummation of human evolution."

Why Communism is "Dead"

It should be obvious by now why "the death of Communism" had to be staged. How else could Michael Gorbachev, chief Marxist-Leninist, and agent for Pharisees of The City of London, be able to base his operations in the world's chief anti-Communist country? How else would Western leaders consult without alarming their own citizens? How else would the masses be prevented from realizing that the purpose of such consultation is to work out the final details of a Communist world government?

Ask yourself, who developed, financed and controlled Communism all these years? Was it not the Pharisees, who killed Jesus Christ?

The World Conference on Religion and Peace is supported by members of the Catholic hierarchy. It contends that co-operation among religions will bring peace to the world as present conflicts are mainly religious. Its words and actions demonstrate that "co-operation" is a euphemism for a pantheistic unity of religions.

In July 1997, the World Conference on Religion and Peace, aided by the Australian Multicultural Foundation, held a Religion and Cultural Diversity Conference in Melbourne, whose goal was to consider "social cohesion, tolerance and policy-making in religiously diverse societies".

The enemies of Western Christian civilization created a racially, religiously, ethnically, culturally, intolerant and heterogeneous society, with ex-Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser's apartheid policies as their thesis. These conferences are the antithesis to those insoluble problems. Now, thesis and antithesis are being brought together in conflict, to produce the predetermined synthesis of a totalitarian society.

Australia's elite were out in full force to discuss the agenda of the World Conference on Religion and Peace, for brain-washing and people-control. Australia's Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition are both members of the Multicultural Foundation. The Governor of Victoria was part of the Conference planning committee. The Primates of Australia's Greek Orthodox and Anglican churches were speakers. The most important speakers were the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr. George Carey, and President of the Pontifical Council for Inter-Religious Dialogue, Francis Cardinal Arinze, who, because of his position is widely regarded as embodying Vatican thought.

The hodge-podge of would-be leaders of global spirituality of the next millennium showed their true colors when they joined together in a "prayer" containing elements of fire-worship, pantheism, occultism and atheism. At the conference dinner, in a darkened room illuminated only by a candle at each table, approximately 250 bowed their heads and recited this "Prayer for Togetherness".

"Let us focus on the candle, the small quivering fire, the light in the darkness, the call to the evening prayer, the call to thanksgiving ... for our togetherness, for our unity, as sons and daughters of the earth in this vast and ancient land, this sacred soil of the Dreamtime"

"In the presence of the ineffable Other, the Holy Being of Infinity, the Numinous Beyond, the One and the Ultimate, the Alpha and the Omega, the Unknown and the Unknowable, Lord of the Cosmos, Center of Creation God, the God of power and righteousness, we pray to you in the immensity and grandeur of the world..."

Paganism! The Bible says our God was manifested bodily in Messiah, seen with human eyes, touched with hands, preached to the Jews who'd have nothing to do with Him, and to we Gentiles who received Him by Grace (John 1:18; I John 1:1-3; I Timothy 3:16).

Unbelief! The Bible says "How can two walk together except they be agreed in the faith"? These high-ranking men seemingly agree that God is both unknown and unknowable - a complete rejection of the one and only faith, and the Incarnation and divinity of Jesus.

"Dreamtime" is the period of creation from the beginning of time, explained by Australian Aboriginal myths which also humanize and seek to sanctify things in nature. These myths were treated at the convention as parallel to he Genesis account. As in North America, indigenous spirituality is being used to demand political and land rights, with Christianity branded as an "imported" religion that harmed the natives. In actual fact Native Title Rights is the tool to impoverish the Aborigine, and steal the land and resources of all Australians without royalty.

If only people would read the 1936 Manifesto of the Australian Communist Party they'd see that the Pharisees are behind this. For there it is, already written. ("One World Worship", Dr. Carl McIntire; "Wisconsin Report", November 6, 1997, Comilia R. Ferreira; "Red Over Black", Geoff McDonald).

Vatican Political Authority over Jerusalem

Barry Chamish reports from Jerusalem that Shimon Peres made a very strange deal with the Vatican. Consider the evidence:

On September 10, 1993, just three days before the signing of the Declaration of Principles in Washington, the Italian news magazine "La Stampa" reported that part of the peace deal was an unwritten understanding that the Vatican would receive political authority over the Old City of Jerusalem by the end of the millennium. The newspaper reported that Shimon Peres had promised to hand over the holy sites of Jerusalem to the Pope, and that Arafat had accepted the agreement.

In March 1994, the Israeli newsmagazine "Shishi" published an interview with Mark Halter, a French intellectual and close friend of Shimon Peres. He said he delivered a letter from Peres to the Pope the previous May, within which Peres offered the Vatican hegemony over the Old City of Jerusalem. The article detailed Peres's offer which essentially turned Jerusalem into an international city overseen by the Holy See.

In March 1995, the radio station Arutz Sheva announced that it had received a copy of a cable sent by the Israeli Embassy in Rome to the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem, outlining the hand over of the Old City of Jerusalem to the Vatican. Two days later "Haaretz" published the cable on its front page. The Foreign Ministry explained that the cable was genuine but someone had whited out the word "not." ie We will not transfer authority to the Vatican. Numerous B'nei B'rak rabbis, who'd canceled Passover meetings with Peres over the issue of the cable, accepted the explanation and reinvited him to their homes.

Once Labor was in power, negotiations with the Vatican began immediately, with Foreign Minister Peres sending his Deputy Yossi Beilin to Rome to hammer out an agreement.

When it was announced in late 1993, the public was told that many of the clauses were to remain secret. However, some of them were leaked, leading to the following consequences.

The Foreign Ministry's Legal Affairs Spokesperson, Esther Samilag, publicly complained about "various capitulations" to the Vatican. She was immediately transferred to a post at the Israeli Embassy in Katmandu, Nepal.

Avraham Shapira announced in the Knesset that he had information that all Vatican property in Jerusalem was to become tax exempt, and that large tracts of real estate on Mount Zion were given to the Pope in perpetuity.

Jerusalem's Deputy Mayor Shmuel Meir announced that he'd received "information that the properties promised to the Vatican would be granted extra-territorial status." Perhaps it was unconnected, but Meir was later killed by a Palestinian truck driver, who was never prosecuted for dangerous driving.

Forced to answer the accusations, Beilin admitted "Included in the Vatican Agreement is the issue of Papal properties in Israel. That will be resolved by a committee of experts that's already formed." This committee has not since released any proof of its existence.

With all this in mind, how do we interpret the Vatican's current position on Jerusalem? The following report was circulated by MSA News.

VATICAN CITY, June 14, 1997 (VIS) - Archbishop Renato Martino, apostolic nuncio and Holy See permanent observer to the UN, spoke June 9 on the status of Jerusalem, at the New York headquarters of the Path to Peace Foundation.

The archbishop addressed members of this foundation as well as US members of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem.

He began by briefly summarizing the "well-known and long-standing position of the Holy See with regard to Jerusalem. He stated that Jerusalem for us, of course, along with the rest of the Holy Land, is that special link between heaven and earth, that place where God walked and ultimately died among men. And of course we recognize that others revere Jerusalem as the city of David and the prophets, and the city known to Mohammed ... It is a spiritual treasure for all of humanity and it's a city of two peoples, Arabs and Jews, and of the three monotheistic religions, Christianity, Judaism and Islam."

Archbishop Martino added, "In recent years it's been increasingly difficult to break through the political and media-imposed stranglehold on the question of Jerusalem." He recounted Jerusalem's recent history, recalling in particular the UN General Assembly's Resolution 181 of 1947, calling for Jerusalem to be considered a 'corpus separatum' under the Trusteeship Council of the UN," a resolution which Israel accepted.

He pointed out that in addressing the gridlock which resulted from the 1967 Israeli occupation of East Jerusalem, "the Holy See has therefore advocated granting to Jerusalem of an 'internationally guaranteed special statute. That's the phrase used by Pope John Paul II in his 1984 Apostolic Letter 'Redemptionis Anno'."

This statute "asks that regardless how the problem of sovereignty is resolved and who is called upon to exercise it, there should be a supra-national and international entity endowed with means adequate to insure the preservation of the special characteristics of the City, its Holy Places, the freedom to visit them, its religious and ethnic communities, a guarantee of their essential liberties, and its city plan".

The apostolic nuncio recalled the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Holy See and Israel in 1993, when both signed the "Fundamental Agreement." He noted Article 4 of this agreement where "both the Holy See and Israel affirm their continuing commitment to the 'Status quo' in the Christian Holy Places."

He also spoke of the problems sparked by Israel's recent authorization of "a project for the construction of settlements in occupied territory in East Jerusalem", for which "there was wide- spread international condemnation." This issue, he reminded those present, was brought before the UN Security Council on March 7 and March 21 of 1997, but without resolution "because the sole country on the Security Council which opposed the Resolution was the United States."

An Emergency Session of the General Assembly, "organized only nine other times in the history of the United Nations", was held on April 24-25. The Holy See delegation was contacted and asked for suggestions for a Resolution, said Archbishop Martino. And he recounted the meetings, rough drafts of proposals and negotiations which followed.

The approved texts of the eventual Resolution, he underlined, contained "those points championed by the Holy See.... The General Assembly has here called for 'internationally guaranteed provisions' - the equivalent of the 'internationally guaranteed special status' called for by Pope John Paul II. This is particularly noteworthy because in this case, the Arab delegations all voted for this Resolution, and therefore for this provision."

"The Holy Places within Jerusalem," concluded Archbishop Martino, "are not merely museum relics to be opened and closed by the dominant political authority, no matter who that might be at any given moment. They're living shrines, precious to the hearts and faith of believers."

We ask. Could that supra-national entity which will oversee the International city of Jerusalem be the Vatican, as Peres promised? (, "The Vatican and Israel" By Barry Chamish, 1998).

The prophet Daniel spoke of these things. radio110.htm

.../Back to Index

e-mail to: