Android Phone

Bible Believers' Newsletter 1335

"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; we extend an especial welcome to new Subscribers and trust you will be blessed in fellowship around God's unchanging Word.

God's Bible is living Word: what we read are shadows and types or prophesies that must come to pass in their designated and decreed season and time. Let us review history from 1917 to the present day. Many great contemporary leaders, like certain heroes of yore were treacherous traitors. Their hidden aims and objectives sought socialist world government. Such men long dead and buried, having made war against God and man by way of deception are glorified in the book history.

God is not trying to "save the Lost" for every child in Adam's race is "saved" from mother's womb. After the age of accountability we become responsible for our decisions and actions which determine who is elect from the foundation of the world. Jesus said we must walk in the Light for our day (I John 1:7; II Peter 1:12). Each angel shone the Light for his Age from Pentecost to Laodicea (1906 – 1963). Christ received the Light for that Age, "winked" the believers ignorance of the fullness of the Word and baptized them into His Body with eternal Life (I Corinthians 13:10-13; Revelation 10:7). The Church Ages ended in apostasy, 62 years later denominational folk are impersonating the Word for a day gone by and "know it not." We must recognize our day and it's Message.

Throughout the Book of Revelation John represents Christ's end-time Bride caught up into the 'rapture' (Revelation 4:1-2) to witness Christ claim the Book of Life and loose the Seals (Revelation 5). "That which is perfect (or complete, Christ the fullness of the Word) is come, PART Word and Christ's mediation for ignorance is "done away." William Branham, the angel to the Laodicean Church Age was the Elijah of Malachi 4:5, 6b and Matthew 17:11 who introduced Christ's second or (Gk.) 'parousia' coming and restored Christ's end-time Bride to the faith of our apostolic fathers. He was the prophet of Revelation 10:7 whose Message "finished the Mystery of God" which is Christ, the fullness of the Word (John 1:1) who revealed the Seven Seals through the lips of His Prophet from March 17-24, 1963 (I Thessalonians 5:2).

New Subscribers must recognize that trinitarian belief is Babylonian paganism adopted as Roman Catholic dogma when the church organized at the First Nicaea Council 300 years after Calvary. You must then "repent of your unbelief and be baptized by full immersion in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ for the remission of sins and you shall receive the Gift of the Holy Ghost" (Acts 2:38-39).

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott

Trump's New Target of Trade War: Chinese Merchant Fleet and Shipyards

April 29, 2025 — The US owed its hegemony, which reached an imperial dimension in the early 1990s, to its national power, primarily its naval, trade and financial power. This power has diminished today. Its economic power and naval power are in serious decline. The recovery of this decline is dependent on decades. On the other hand, the world is turning and the Russia-China duo is in a period of great power competition.

The US has seriously challenged the front it has established with Israel, the EU and its traditional allies in the Pacific. Trump has taken urgent measures, seeing the gravity of this situation. These measures have destroyed the Washington Consensus established after 1945. Trump has begun to question the defense guarantees given by the US to Europe and Japan, and even intelligence sharing with Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Trump has withdrawn from the UN Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization. He has halted all distribution of USAID and US foreign aid. He even goes so far as to advocate withdrawing from the IMF and the World Bank. He has openly declared his intention to withdraw from Europe in the field of defense. He has sought to reduce the US's role in NATO. He has supported Russia and its old enemies such as Belarus and North Korea in the Ukraine votes held at the UN. In short, Trump is not making these maneuvers for nothing. Full story: globalresearch.ca

Comment: Very important history from 1608 – 2028.

Waiting on Xi Jinping

Donald Trump

April 29, 2025 — President Donald Trump announces unilateral tariffs on 180 countries despite warnings of inflation, recession and supply chain disruptions, April 2, 2025: This is probably the worst economic policy I've ever seen . . . There is no way that this policy will bring manufacturing back to the United States and "make America wealthy again" . . . if anything, it'll make us much poorer. Many are saying that this tariff policy is the "end of globalization". I don't think so . . . This is the end of America's participation in globalization —Molson Hart@Molson_Hart, Founder and CEO of Viahart, a consumer products company.

The embargo on Chinese goods suggests that Washington is finally making its definitive pivot to Asia. Ukraine is being handed over to the NATO allies while the US shifts its attention to the Far East. The administration is already committed to strengthening its military presence in the region, building support for an anti-China coalition, inciting incidents in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea and now, imposing a complete embargo on China without any prior notice and without the slightest provocation. The new tariffs fit seamlessly with Washington's broader strategy of containing the one rival that is most likely to become the undisputed regional hegemon. Full story: globalresearch.ca

There will be Another Crisis. It will be More Significant. It will be Faster than we've seen with COVID

April 29, 2025 — The World Economic Forum (WEF) which represents the Western financial elites played a key role in the launching of the March 11, 2020 corona lockdown, which was conducive to a worldwide process of economic and social chaos. It also supported the launching of the Covid-19 vaccine in November 2020, which (amply documented) has been conducive (worldwide) to an upward trend in mortality and morbidity. And now they are "promising" us a Crisis which is "Much Worse than Covid".

Over the last four years, starting in January 2020, "the deliberate triggering of chaos" has become part of a broad and complex agenda:

Israel's genocide directed against the People of Palestine,
    An unfolding US-NATO-Israel military agenda against the broader Middle East.
    US Threats against Iran
    US-NATO threats directed against the Russian Federation
    Confrontation directed against China
    Cyber-Attacks Full story: globalresearch.ca

Confiscating Palestine's Maritime Natural Gas Reserves

April 29, 2025 — Israel has launched an invasion (October 7, 2023) of the Gaza Strip. As outlined by Felicity Arbuthnot with foresight 10 years ago: "Israel is set to become a major exporter of gas and some oil, "If All Goes to Plan." In the current context, Israel's "All Goes to Plan" option consists in bypassing Palestine and "Wiping Gaza off the Map," as well confiscating ALL Gaza's maritime offshore gas reserves, worth billions of dollars. The ultimate objective is not only to exclude Palestinians from their homeland, it consists in confiscating the multi-billion dollar Gaza offshore Natural Gas reserves, namely those pertaining to the BG (BG Group) in 1999, as well the 2013 Levant discoveries.

An official "secret" memorandum authored by Israel's Ministry of Intelligence "is recommending the forcible and permanent transfer of the Gaza Strip's 2.2 million Palestinian residents to Egypt's Sinai Peninsula," namely to a refugee camp in Egyptian territory. There are indications of Israel-Egypt negotiations as well as consultations with the US. The 10-page document, dated Oct. 13, 2023, bears the logo of the Intelligence Ministry . . . assesses three options regarding the future of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip . . . It recommends a full population transfer as its preferred course of action. . . . The document, whose authenticity was confirmed by the ministry, has been translated into English . . . and video Full story: globalresearch.ca

The Defeat of Nazism? Liberation still to be Gained

April 28, 2025 — Nazism re-emerged in Europe when the West again attacked Russia by organising the coup in Ukraine. Through the CIA and other intelligence services, neo-Nazi militants are being recruited, financed, trained and armed to go into action on Kiev's Maidan Square in February 2014. The neo-Nazi formations are then incorporated into the National Guard trained by US instructors from the 173rd Airborne Brigade, transferred from Vicenza (in the North of Italy) to Ukraine, and joined by others from NATO.

The Ukraine of Kiev becomes the nursery of resurgent Nazism in the heart of Europe. Neo-Nazis arrive in Kiev from all over Europe (including Italy) and the USA, recruited mainly by Pravy Sektor and the Azov Battalion, whose Nazi imprint is represented by the SS Das Reich emblem. After being trained and tested in military actions against Ukrainian Russians in the Donbass, they are sent back to their country with a Ukrainian passport. At the same time, Nazi ideology is being disseminated among the younger generation in Ukraine. The Azov battalion is particularly involved in this regard, organising military training camps and ideological education for children and young people, who are taught first and foremost to hate Russians. Full story: globalresearch.ca

Comment: The deliberate overcounting of Covid-19 deaths, namely deaths resulting from SARS-CoV-2 is beyond description. The PCR test is totally unreliable in detecting the alleged virus. From the outset, the practice consists is allocating ALL PCR positive cases to Covid. globalresearch.ca

Reiner Fuellmich, Sentenced to Prison for Telling the COVID Truth

WHO

April 28, 2025 — One of Germany's top lawyers for human rights and people's justice, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, was today sentenced for three years and nine months prison time. This after more than 50 Court sessions, and more than 18 months in preventive detention—three times more than the usual German maximum of about six months. About a third of these 18 months, Reiner was . . . handcuffed, foot-shackled and body searched every time he had to leave his prison cell, to go to Court, to medical appointments or other administrative out of prison tasks. Reiner Fuellmich is famous for winning Court cases against Deutsche Bank, and against Volkswagen (VW), on behalf of the people.

There is evidence that Germany's Secret Service was involved . . . Leaked Dossier Shows German Government Conspired to Silence Reiner Fuëllmich. Watch here . . . Human Rights on Trial: The Case of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and Why the World Must Act. Full story: globalresearch.ca

Are You Tired of Hearing about Antisemitism?

Star of David

April 27, 2025 — One might well ask how a group composed of little more than 3% of the US population has managed to gain control of the nation's foreign policy, its legislature and executive branches, its media, its entertainment industry, its financial institutions, and its elite universities while also making the United States subservient to the wishes of a monstrous small state located seven thousand miles away and composed of its coreligionists? Well, it helps to have a great deal of money liberally applied to corrupt the existing political and economic systems, but that is not necessarily a good place to start as one might reflexively be accused of wielding a trope much favored by antisemites when discussing Zionist Jews, the group of which we are speaking. Alternatively perhaps, one might take an oblique approach by observing how the highly privileged and protected Zionists in question get rich living in America while having true loyalty to apartheid Israel, something that normally might be considered untenable if not borderline treasonous.

Recent reports suggest that there are upwards of 23,000 Americans serving in the Israeli Army (IDF), most of whom are presumably dual nationals with Israeli citizenship. Under existing law, they should all lose their US citizenship but that will not happen as Congress and the White House have both been bought. Indeed, they are being given a golden handshake by the US Congress with a new bill currently in Congress which would extend some US military benefits to the notional American citizens who are currently carrying out the Gaza genocide as members of the IDF . . . arch-Zionist Donald Trump should pick up the phone in the Oval Office and call Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to tell him that America has become tired and the game is over . . . Full story: globalresearch.ca

Comment: According to official Israeli statistics blood tests and DNA prove 90% of so-called "Jews" and non-Semitic.

Elections 2025: Canadian Sovereignty & Independent Foreign Policy

April 27, 2025 — "The Trump statement in regards to the 51st state is somewhat obsolete, because we've gone way past that. Our country is a military area of the United States of America, and without adequate consultations."

But this election sees a bit of a twist on this principle, one that completely reset the country's policy landscape. This one largely reacts, oscillates, and revolves around the figure of one man whose love of tariffs, embrace of a genocidal state of Israel and possession of a notorious reputation of vindictiveness instills a response from the vast majority of Canucks. Donald Trump and his declared choice for Canadians between being punished with tariffs or being rewarded as the 51st state completely dominates political discussion from the water cooler buzz to mid-evening dinner conversations to chatter in the street . . . Full story: globalresearch.ca

President Dwight D. Eisenhower & World Revolution

Balfour Declaration

The simultaneous triumphs of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London (i.e. the Balfour Declaration) in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events. The identity of their original source has been shown, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: "Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations"; the one destroyed in the East and the other (Rothschild's City of London) secretly ruled in the West.

1917 gave proof of Disraeli's dictum about the revolution in its 1848 phase, when he said that Jews headed "every one" of the secret societies and aimed to destroy Christianity. The controlling group that emerged in 1917 was so preponderantly Jewish that it may be called Jewish. The nature of the instigating force then became a matter of historical fact, not of further polemical debate. It was further identified by its deeds: the character of its earliest enactments, a symbolic mockery of Christianity, and a special mark of authorship deliberately given to the murder of the monarch. All these bore the traits of a Talmudic vengeance.

In the forty years that have passed great efforts have been made to suppress public knowledge of this fact, which has been conclusively established, by non-sequential rebukes to any who claim to discuss history. For instance, in the 1950's an able (and deservedly respected) Jewish writer in America, Mr. George Sokolsky, in criticizing a book previously cited "The Iron Curtain Over America", wrote, "It is impossible to read it without reaching the conclusion that Professor Beaty seeks to prove that Communism is a Jewish movement". In respect of the leadership it was that for a long period before 1917 (as to later and the present situation, subsequent chapters will look at the evidence). It was not a conspiracy of all Jews, but neither were the French revolution, Fascism and National Socialism conspiracies of all Frenchmen, Italians or Germans. The organizing force and the leadership were drawn from the Talmudic-controlled Jewish areas of Russia; in that sense Communism was demonstrably Eastern Jewish. (Early in the 19th century Napoleon divided Israelites who held the Torah, from non-Semitic Khazars who hold to the Talmud and the Sephardim lost their authority which for several centuries they exercised over other Jews. This doubtless contributed to his downfall).

As to the purposes revealed when the revolution struck in 1917, these showed that it was not episodic or spontaneous but the third "eruption" of the organization first revealed through Weishaupt. The two main features reappeared: the attack on all legitimate government of any kind whatsoever and on religion. Since 1917 the world-revolution has had to cast aside the earlier pretence of being directed only against "kings" or the political power of priests. One authority of that period knew and stated this. In the tradition of Edmund Burke and John Robison, George Washington and Alexander Hamilton and Disraeli, Mr. Winston Churchill wrote:

"It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti-Christ were designed to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations, both of the divine and the diabolical . . . From the days of 'Spartacus' Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others".

This is the last candid statement (discoverable by me) from a leading public man on this question. After it the ban on public discussion came down and the great silence ensued, which continues to this day. In 1953 Mr. Churchill refused permission (requisite under English law) for a photostat to be made of this article (Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920), without saying why (Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion, p. 272–273). Mr. Robert Wilson, correspondent of the London Times, experienced the Bolshevik revolution.

If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men (oligarchs and billionaires with tax-free foundations and NGOs) promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. The plan of the conspirator Insiders then is to socialize the United States (and your country), not to Communize it (Gary Allen, "None Dare Call It Conspiracy").

As you carefully read this paper you will recognize leading politicians, such as President Eisenhower, other US Presidents and the leaders of your nation, regardless of party politics serve the objective of world revolution. Zionist Professor Arnold Toynbee truly stated their plan:

"We are working at present DISCREETLY BUT WITH ALL OUR MIGHT, to wrest this mysterious political force called 'Sovereignty' out of the clutches of the local national states of our world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands!"

This is the Judaic system and the plan of the Protocols. They must get rid of state sovereignty before they can establish international authority. You will recall that in 1990 President George Bush Senior announced the imminence of "a new world order." Christians should be familiar with the Protocols whose prescience is vindicated by history.

Their Welfare State means social equality as well as political equality. It means the mongrelization of the races. There will be no Anglo-Saxons, Jews, Negroes, and Chinese but we will develop a mongrelized race as a result of the mixture of these races. It is their plan to have absolute social and economic equality. There will be no trade barriers such as a tariff. The same standard of wages will prevail in Africa, Asia, Europe, and America. The United Nations, the World Federalist Union, or the State of Israeli will be the employer. There may be no strikes or wars. We may have peace, without liberty, but we will have little else except slavery, for there will not be much production. We will be slaves of the Super-State. "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy" contends Rothschild multi-millionaire Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.

The threat of instant massive retaliation as the sole weapon by which the United States would get Russia to adopt more acceptable policies was equally unrealistic. No one, not even Dulles, dared to use it in the face of the Soviet Union's capability for retaliation. Nuclear blackmail is bad, but nuclear blackmail in which the blackmailer has no intention or opportunity to inflict his penalty is pointless and dangerous—unless, perhaps, such threats help to win elections.

EisenhowerIt helped win an election for Eisenhower in 1952. The candidate had no particular assets except a bland and amiable disposition combined with his reputation as a victorious general. He also had a weakness, one which is frequently found in his profession, the conviction that anyone who has become a millionaire, even by inheritance, is an authoritative person on almost any subject. With Eisenhower as candidate, combined with Richard Nixon, the ruthless enemy of internal subversion, as a running mate, and using a campaign in which the powers of Madison Avenue publicity mobilized all the forces of American discontent behind the neo-isolationist program. Victory in November 1952r was assured. The coup de grâce was given to the Democratic candidate, Governor Allai Stevenson of Illinois, darling of the academic intellectuals, when Eisenhower adopted Emmet Hughes's suggestion that he promise, if elected, to go to Korea to make peace.

Although not himself a neo-isolationist or a reactionary, Eisenhower had few deep personal convictions, and was eager to be President. When his advisers told him that he must collaborate with the Radical Right, he went all the way, even to the extent of condoning Senator McCarthy's attack on General Marshall. This occurred when Eisenhower, under McCarthy's pressure, removed from a Wisconsin speech a favourable reference to Marshall.

Once elected, the new President reintoduced the Republican conception of the Presidency which had been used in 1921 – 1923. This conception saw the President as a kind of titular chairman of the board who neither acted himself directly nor intervened indirectly in the actions of his delegated assistants. Fully aware of his own limitations of both knowledge and energy, Eisenhower allotted the functions of government to his Cabinet members ("eight millionaires and a plumber," according to one writer) and expected to be consulted himself only in unsettled disputes or major policy changes . . .

Eisenhower as president can be summed up in one word: amiability. He not only liked people; he was eager to be liked, and was, indeed, likeable. If he gave the impression that he had no firmly held convictions, that was because of two other qualities: he was relaxed, fully willing to live and let live, in an easygoing tolerance of everything which did not disturb his own peace of mind. He was quick-tempered but not a fighter. He had convictions, none of them very firm, but he was not prepared to sacrifice his own rest and relaxation for them, except for brief occasions. His span of attention was neither long nor intense. As a consequence, he was a wonderful companion, but not a leader.

The rare references to Mr. Baruch in this narrative do not denote the extent of his influence. The best observers known to me all believed that he was the most powerful of the men around American presidents over a period of more than forty years, up to now. His biographer states that he continued to act as adviser to every American president (including the three Republican ones of 1920, 1924 and 1928) from President Wilson on, and, writing in 1952, predicted that he would also "advise" President Eisenhower and even gave an outline of what this advice would be. Mr. Baruch's true place in this story, or the present writer's estimate of it, will be shown at a later stage, when he made his most significant open appearance.

Like that of a chancellor at a royal birth, the shadow of Zionism fell over the selection, nomination and election of General Eisenhower. His meteoric promotion during the 1939-1945 war, from the rank of a colonel, unversed in combat, to that of Supreme Commander of all the Allied armies invading Europe, seems to indicate that he was marked down for advancement long before, and research supports that inference. In the 1920's young Lieutenant Eisenhower attended the National War College in Washington, where a Mr. Bernard Baruch (who had played so important a part in the selection, nomination and election of President Woodrow Wilson in 1911-1912) gave instruction. Mr. Baruch at that early period decided that Lieutenant Eisenhower was star pupil, and when General Eisenhower was elected president thirty years later he told American veterans that he had for a quarter-century "had the privilege of sitting at Bernard's feet and listening to his words". Early in his presidency Mr. Eisenhower intervened to resolve, in Mr. Baruch's favour, a small dispute at the National War College, where some opposed acceptance of a bust of Mr. Baruch, presented by admirers (no living civilian's bust was ever displayed there before).

The support of "the adviser to six Presidents" obviously may have helped bring about Lieutenant Eisenhower's rapid rise to the command of the greatest army in history. On public record is the support which Mr. Baruch gave when General Eisenhower (who had no party affiliations or history) in 1952 offered himself as Republican Party candidate for the presidency. Up to that time Mr. Baruch had been a "staunch member of the Democratic Party, not just a regular Democrat, but a passionate approver of the party label and an almost fanatical hater of the Republican label" (his approved biography). In 1952 Mr. Baruch suddenly became a passionate approver of the Republican label, provided that Mr. Eisenhower wore it. Evidently strong reasons must have caused this sudden change in a lifetime's allegiance, and they are worth seeking. . . . President Roosevelt appointed General Marshall Chief of Staff in 1939 over the heads of twenty major generals and fourteen senior brigadiers (six years earlier his nomination to general, being adversely reported on by the Inspector General, had been barred by the then Chief of Staff, General Douglas MacArthur). One of General Marshall's earliest acts was, in 1940, to ask Senator James F. Byrnes (an intimate of Mr. Bernard Baruch) to propose an amendment to an army estimates bill authorizing the Chief of Staff to override seniority rules in favour of younger officers held by him to be "of unusual ability". Senator Byrnes's amendment, then adopted, provided that "in time of war or national emergency . . . any officer of the Regular Army may be appointed to higher temporary grade. . .", and under this empowerment General Marshall during 1940 made 4,088 promotions, among them that of the fifty-year old Colonel Dwight Eisenhower, who then had no battle or command experience but within three years was to become Supreme Allied Commander. The combination of General Marshall and General Eisenhower was decisive in shaping the outcome of the war in 1945.

. . . General Eisenhower had informed Stalin directly on March 28 that he would stop short of Vienna 1. On April 14 he informed the Chiefs of Staff that he would stop seventy miles short of Berlin, 2. on the Elbe line, adding "If you agree, I propose to inform Marshal Stalin"; as British objections had already been overridden, the first three words were but a matter of form. There still remained Prague, 3. capital of captive Czechoslovakia. General Eisenhower advised Stalin that he would advance to Prague "if the situation required"; he had substantial forces standing idle on the Czech border. Stalin replied (May 9, 1945) requesting General Eisenhower "to refrain from advancing the Allied forces in Czechoslovakia beyond the . . . Karlsbad, Pilsen and Budweis line". General Eisenhower at once ordered his General Patton to halt on that line.

Bisection of EuropeThus "the hideous bisection" of Europe was brought about; to this description of it Mr. Churchill added the platitudinous comment, "it cannot last". "General Eisenhower five years later claimed that he alone was responsible for these three fatal decisions: "I must make one thing clear. Your question seems to imply that the decision not to march into Berlin was a political decision. On the contrary, there is only one person in the world responsible for that decision. That was I. There was no one to interfere with it in the slightest way" . . .

General Eisenhower's statement cannot have been true, even if he thought it was. The order to hold back the Allied advance until the Red armies had taken possession of Germany and Central Europe, with its three chief capitals, obviously followed the "policy" which, demonstrably, governed Lend-Lease: that of giving preference to the demands of the Soviet state over all other allies, and even over the needs of America itself. For that matter, General Eisenhower's own naval aide and biographer, Captain Harry C. Butcher, specifically states that when General Eisenhower (against Mr. Churchill's protest) opened direct communication with Moscow about the halting-line for the Allied advance, the question of "boundaries and areas to be occupied had gone beyond the sphere of military headquarters". General Eisenhower's actions clearly followed a predetermined political plan agreed at the highest level; by the time he became President its consequences were plain to see and he might have felt "haunted" by President Roosevelt's example (as Mr. Roosevelt was always "haunted" by that of President Wilson).

Here is the explanation for the fate of Vienna, Berlin and Prague; in March, April and May General Eisenhower, in the messages accordingly sent direct to Moscow of which Mr. Churchill complained, submitted his plan in advance and agreed to halt the Allied armies west of these capitals . . . Under the "Protocol on German Reparations" the basic device of Soviet terrorism, slave labour, was approved and extended to the conquered peoples, for this document authorized "the three governments" to obtain reparation from Germany in the form of "the use of German labour".

Under some subsidiary agreement the Western Allies agreed to regard all Russian prisoners as "deserters", to be driven back to the Soviet state. Over 5,000,000 Soviet deserters under General A. A. Vlasov either died of starvation, typhus, froze or committed suicide when Americans betrayed them and were slaughtered by Soviet forces. ("There have been few crimes in history more brutal and more extensive than this forced repatriation of anti-Communists, to which Dwight Eisenhower committed the honor of the United States").

. . . the infestation of the American government and its departments by agents of the (Communist) revolution, which began with Mr. Roosevelt's first presidency in 1933, had not been remedied in 1955, despite many exposures; and that, as this was the case, American energies in any third war could in the same way be diverted to promote the overriding plan for a communized world-society (Lenin's third stage in the process). Once more the embroiled masses would fight to bring about results, the direct opposites of the causes held out to them at any new "Pearl Harbour" (as occured under the Zionist Necons in the demolition of the WTC on 9/11). "The United States was making greater strides toward socialism under Eisenhower than even under Roosevelt" That's really saying something!"

On the last day of the full Yalta Conference Stalin asked Mr. Roosevelt if he meant to make any concessions to King Ibn Saoud and the President replied "that there was only one concession he thought he might offer and that was to give him" (Ibn Saoud) "the six million Jews in the United States". (This quotation was authentic but was expunged from the official record). President Roosevelt was familiar with the claim that six million Jews (so-called) had been 'exterminated' multiple times between 1869 and 1945 (e.g. Gittin 57b states that Vespasian killed 4 billion Jews in the city of Bethar and that Hadrian slaughtered 1.2 million Jews in Alexandria. Gittin 58a claims the Romans wrapped 64 million Jewish children in scrolls and burned them alive).

This undermining of the West was not confined to the United States; it was general throughout the Western world and this chapter dwells on the American case only because, in the conditions of today, the strength and wealth of America are so great that their use or misuse probably will decide the issue. A similar condition was shown to exist in the country, Britain, from which the great overseas nations originally sprang, and in the two greatest of these, Canada and Australia. The first exposure came in Canada, immediately after the war's end, and this is the only one of the four Cases in which full governmental investigation and full public disclosure of the results followed; also, it lit the fuse which in time led to all the other exposures, in America, Australia and Britain. A Russian, at the risk of his life, disclosed to the Canadian Government the network of governmental infestation and espionage of which the Soviet Embassy at Ottawa was the centre (despite the leading part taken by Russians in this process of warning Western politicians and the press continued to incite their peoples against "Russians", not against the revolutionary conspiracy of which Russia was the captive) . . .

Brother Branham spoke positively yet his words were not THUS SAITH THE LORD unless the Holy Spirit confirmed the fact. He said, "I think that Eisenhower's been one of the greatest presidents since Lincoln. I like him. He's a real gentleman" (56-1006, A Wedding Supper, par E-17). "Mr. Eisenhower went out, the last Protestant of America in the president, which I doubt there'll ever be another one" (61-0806, The Seventieth Week of Daniel, par. 126). Visit Newsletter 1306 and search "Eisenhower." Born-again Christians forming the Capstone of Christ's Body must prove all things by two or three witnesses of God's unchanging Word because opinions are not facts as we exposed in the lies of the holocaust ™. The genocide of innocent millions after World War II were not Jews but young German men, starved, left to the elements or shot under in Germany and France along with Russian soldiers betrayed by Stalin and Eisenhower.

Individually we must "study to show our self approved of God, a workman that needs not be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of truth" (II Timothy 2:15). I am in constant contact with ministers and church-goers worldwide that believe and teach the Babylonian trinity adopted by Catholicism at the First Nicaea Council in AD325 three centuries after Calvary and two and a half centuries after the death of St. Peter. Their baptism is unscriptural and they believe Jesus Christ was a Jew; an 18th century English word. In the days of our Lord the majority of Judeans were Edomites and physical Serpent's seed (Matthew 33-36; John 8:44). The Church Ages and Christ's mediation ended in apostasy in 1963; and "that which was in part was done away" (I Corinthians 13:10). The last Gentile prophet was William Branham (1909-1965); people do not understand modern history.

Morganthau PlanThe genesis of the "Morgenthau Plan" for the dismemberment of Germany into petty provinces, the destruction of its industry and flooding of its mines and its reduction to the status of "a goat pasture" was described by another Assistant Secretary to the Treasury, Mr. Fred Smith, in 1947. He said it was first discussed at a meeting (at which he was present) between General Eisenhower, Mr. Morgenthau and Mr. White in the general's mess tent in the south of England on August 7, 1944. Mr. White (says Mr. Smith) raised the subject of Germany; General Eisenhower said he would like to "see things made good and hard for them for a while . . . the whole German population is a synthetic paranoid"; and Mr. White remarked, "We may want to quote you on the problem of handling the German people", whereon General Eisenhower said he could do this. Mr. Morgenthau, on this basis, devised the "plan" and went to London to canvass it with Mr. Churchill and Mr. Eden, then returning by air to America to put it before President Roosevelt.

Up to that point, says Mr. Smith, the State Department had not been informed of Mr. Morgenthau's activities in the matter. Mr. Roosevelt apparently had misgivings and formed a committee to develop the plan, in which committee the Secretaries of State and War at last joined Mr. Morgenthau of the Treasury. The disclosure of the Morgenthau Plan before this committee "resulted in as violent an explosion as has ever occurred in the hallowed chambers of the White House"; Mr. Hull and Mr. Stimson both violently attacked it. Nevertheless, when President Roosevelt then went to Quebec to meet Mr. Churchill Mr. Morgenthau "happened" to be with him, and Mr. Hull and Mr. Stimson were left behind. Mr. Churchill records his surprise at that, but both he and Mr. Roosevelt then signed "the Morgenthau Plan", which possibly might more accurately be called the White-Morgenthau plan . . .

The public masses were left to infer that error had been realized in time and that "the Morgenthau Plan" was abandoned; the factories were not blown up and the mines were not flooded. This was soothing syrup, not truth. The spirit of the peace of vengeance, proposed in the White-Morgenthau plan, did prevail. Mr. Morgenthau did not succeed with his proposal (the one jocularly made by Mr. Roosevelt to Stalin at Yalta) that "archcriminals" should be put to death by the military without provision for any trial, but the trials which were held (Nuremberg) remain a blot on Western justice. The bisection of Germany (which in fact was the bisection of Europe, friend or foe) was more perilous to the future than any dismemberment of Germany into provinces. Above all, the West, by approving slave labour, put the civilizing process of nineteen centuries into reverse. (Significantly, eleven years after the war's end the United States Government withheld its adherence to an international convention, proposed by the International Labour Organization, outlawing forced labour; it was obviously debarred from adhering by its signature to the Yalta agreements).

February 10, 1944: after the Yalta Conference ended British and American bombers for hours on end rained explosive on Dresden, and after that came General Eisenhower's order to halt the Anglo-American advance on the Elbe line, and therewith to abandon Berlin, Vienna and Prague, and all East Europe to the Soviet armies. This was vengeance upon friend and foe alike . . . By these acts the wartime leaders of England and America reintroduced slavery in Europe in 1945!

March 10: Eisenhower and signs an order creating the lethal DEF status for prisoners, which breaks the Geneva Convention. He gives a speech in Paris saying that the U.S. obeys the Geneva Convention.

May 8: Germany surrenders. The U.S. removes Switzerland as the Protecting Power for German prisoners, contravening the Geneva Convention. Eisenhower tells Churchill he has reduced prisoner rations and may reduce them further. Patton releases captives rapidly. Eisenhower orders his generals to stop releasing prisoners; row rations are reduced again.

June 2: General Lee strongly disputes incorrect prisoner totals being given out by Eisenhower's HQ. Littlejohn complains that he cannot feed the prisoners—now about 4,000,000. Many prisoners are secretly transferred to the lethal DEF status without food or shelter. German civilians are prevented from feeding prisoners. Civilians themselves begin to starve. The ICRC attempts to send food into Germany, but the trains are sent back by the U.S. Army. Prime Minister King of Canada complains about the removal of Geneva Convention protection from German prisoners. The British Foreign Office silences him.

July: Many U.S. prisoners are transferred to the French army in dying condition. Captain Julien says one American camp looks like Buchenwald.

August: An order signed by Eisenhower consigns all remaining rows to lethal DEF status. The death rate immediately shoots up. General Littlejohn complains in writing to Eisenhower that 1,550,000 people supposed to be getting U.S. Army rations are receiving nothing. The ICRC is forced to return food to donors because it is not allowed to send it to Germany.

September: Jean-Pierre Pradervand of the ICRC tells de Gaulle that one-third of prisoners in French hands recently received from the U.S. Army will soon die unless help quickly arrives. French papers break the Pradervand story. Eisenhower and Gen. Smith deny U.S. guilt. The New York Times reports bad conditions in French camps, nothing about U.S. camps recently visited by star reporter Drew Middleton.

October 10: Littlejohn writes a report to Eisenhower pointing out food surplus in U.S. Army and suggests sending food to U.S.

1945-6
The U.S. winds down prisoner holdings to almost zero by the end of 1946. The French continue holding hundreds of thousands through 1946, gradually reducing their holdings to nothing by about 1949.

1947-1950s
Most records of U.S. prison camps are destroyed. Germans determine that over 1,700,000 soldiers, alive at war's end, have never returned home. All Allies deny responsibility; the U.S., Britain and France accuse Russia of atrocities in camps.

1960s-1972
The West German Foreign Office under Willy Brandt subsidizes books which deny atrocities in U.S. camps. U.S. senators accuse Russians of atrocities, but say nothing of U.S. camps.

1980s
The ICRC refuses to release essential documents to researchers working on U.S. and French camps, and claims no knowledge of Pradervand, who was their chief delegate in France. The ICRC admits two other researchers into the archives to look for material on Nazi death camps. The Ministry of Defence in the UK refuses to release the important Phillimore report to author, although requested to do so by a British cabinet officer. Willy Brandt refuses to discuss his role in censoring and subsidizing books that hide U.S. atrocities.

The Threat of Publicity

Eisenhower's Rhein CampWhile this August Report of the Military Governor was being prepared for distribution on September 20, a thunderstorm of terrifying publicity was building up around U.S. Army headquarters in Frankfurt. We have already seen that the International Committee of the Red Cross, the U.S. State Department and the press all knew or suspected by now that Germans were dying of exposure and starvation in U.S. camps. In August, Jean-Pierre Pradervand of the International Committee of the Red Cross had discovered to his horror that the French camps were filled with diseased, starving men in rags, dying like flies. He knew most of them were very recent transfers from U.S. camps. Thinking he might not be believed without strong evidence, he began photographing the prisoners. So ragged were these prisoners that Pradervand's delegates gave them the clothes off their backs, and drove home in their underwear.20 While that was happening, the U.S. Army had in its warehouses in Germany 13,000,000 Red Cross prisoner-of-war food parcels. They also had clothing and personal equipment for 1,294,000 persons, plus those 5,579,000 toilet articles and 920,000 meters of cloth for making uniforms. There were more than 19,000 tons of medical equipment and supplies as well,21 all captured German equipment. In Paris, dozens of people knew what was happening, and two big papers were getting ready to print major stories. Publication of these facts would destroy Eisenhower's reputation. The first clues were uncovered in 1986 by the author, James Bacque and his assistant.

Millions of disarmed German Forces (DEF) believed they would be delivered into more merciful hands under supreme military commander General Eisenhower unaware of his fierce and obsessive hatred of all things German. More than five million German soldiers in the American and French zones crowded into barbed wire cages open to weather, many of them literally shoulder to shoulder without shelter, lacking even primitive sanitary facilities. The ground soon became a quagmire of filth and disease. Underfed, the prisoners soon began dying of starvation and disease.

On September 14, the first lightning struck, far away in Washington. The International Committee of the Red Cross in Geneva repeated by open cable (not in code) to the State Department French accusations that the Americans were starving their prisoners, then fobbing them off on the French.22 The International Committee of the Red Cross was "anxious" for the U.S. to feed its prisoners. Something had to be done, quickly. All of this is certain; the conjecture as to what happened in early September is shown by italics . . .

Smith and Eisenhower realize the danger and consult as to how they could camouflage the dead. No dead can be added to the totals of future discharges because it has already been decided to suspend discharges for the time being . . . What is needed in a hurry is another, vague category to shroud the dead. Other Losses has already been used to cover the dead in the internal reports from the Armies in May and early August. But everyone at Army headquarters, such as Colonel Lauben, knows it means deaths, so a new definition must be given to help explain it away, or to provide a more plausible cover story for the loyal officers who might be questioned. A typist is instructed to enter a new definition of Other Loses including the Volkssturm on the 12th Army Group records showing DEF transactions to June 6. He pulls out the carbon copy of the existing 12th Army records and simply types the definition in.

Pradervand is invited to Frankfurt and reassured. His photographs disappear into Eisenhower's office, not to be seen again until they reappear as evidence of atrocities in French prisoner-of-war camps. Then they disappear forever. The Weekly PW/DEF and Theater Provost Marshal reports with their revealing details cease. The world press prints the release exonerating the U.S. Army. The prisoners go on dying.

The Fake Definition of Other Losses

However, one interesting set of the 12th Army Group DEF records is overlooked by the officers camouflaging the deaths on the set of forms dated to June 6. This other set, prepared at the 12th Army Group HQ on exactly the same kind of blank printed forms and sent on to the SHAEF-USFET HQ, gives figures up to June 10, four days later. It was typed up later than the forms with the new Volkssturm definition that end on June 6, so it provides another test of the intentions of the person who ordered the new definition of Other Losses to be typed in to the June 6 set. If the definition of Other Losses was authentic, i.e., intended to be used to convey numerical information, that definition must have appeared on all later papers dealing with prisoners at this level. But it does not appear on this later, June 10 set. None of the new definitions appears on this set (see p. 201). The new definition of Other Losses was unusable, was not used and did not appear on later documents where it had to be if it was authentic. The fraud is exposed.

Did Eisenhower Tell the Truth?

. . . Can we believe that Eisenhower, fighting off ghastly accusations that would ruin his reputation, told the truth about prisoners' deaths in September? The answer lies in Eisenhower's record.

First, in the August Report issued on September 20, he does not mention deaths, even though the Theater Provost Marshal had already reported deaths of more than 10,000 prisoners of war. Because of the much higher number of DEFS, there must have been at least 15,000 additional deaths among them. But Eisenhower, the man who wrote "it is a pity we could not have killed more," now surveys the scene and sees no dead. He can see 1,694 prisoners alive and working in the Bremen enclave, he can see 7,632 hospital cases in Germany, but he sees no dead.

Eisenhower's Death CampsIn March 1945 the U.S. was treating its prisoners according to the Geneva Convention. This was not true.23 In a speech before the U.S. Congress in January 1946 he said that the U.S. Army under his command had "repatriated the DPs with sympathy and high regard for the humanitarian nature of the problem." This was not true: violence had often been used by the Army in returning Russian nationals to Russia.24 His senior officers twice misrepresented the number of prisoners with the effect that rations were reduced, causing both Generals Littlejohn and Lee to complain in writing of the inaccurate reporting of prisoners.25 Following advice from General Hughes, he did not sign any orders reducing prisoners' rations, while at the same time telling Winston Churchill that he had reduced rations. No record of this conversation exists in the files at the Eisenhower Library in Abilene, so this would never have been known had not Churchill's staff recorded the conversation in a memo copied later to the State Department.26 The unwritten order in Eisenhower's army that prisoners receive starvation rations was so strong that when General Lee was ordered orally to increase some rations for publicity purposes in October 1945, he asked that confirmation of the order be sent him in writing. No such order has yet been found, but the rations were briefly increased according to the prisoners themselves. What reason did Hughes have for recommending that Eisenhower not write out such orders? So as to leave no record. Why not leave a record? Because it was likely to come back to haunt him with his superiors or with the public. Eisenhower told the lCS in his August report that shelter had been provided for the prisoners. This was not true: shelter had been forbidden by order of the Engineers' Section of the Advance Section of the Army on May 1, 1945, and by General J. C. H. Lee in April 1945.27 All that summer, prisoners died for lack of shelter; all that summer the Army had in stock 58,000 captured German tents which, like the Red Cross food parcels and many other necessary items, were not distributed.28 His command concealed from the Red Cross the continued existence of U.S. prison camps in France after the war, according to Jean-Pierre Pradervand.31 Through General Bedell Smith, his chief of staff, Eisenhower told the French government, his own superiors, the State Department and the press that the hundreds of thousands of prisoners transferred to the French by September 1945 were in good condition with two weeks' rations and greatcoats and blankets. None of that was true.30 When accused later of playing a leading role in the infamous Morgenthau Plan with Harry Dexter White, Eisenhower denied his role. That was not true.31 He twice reported to the lCS that 132,262 prisoners had been transferred from Germany to Austria. That was not true.

This is hardly the record of a man one wishes to trust on accusations of mass deaths occurring under his command. Given the other evidence already known about the Volkssturm discharges, it is impossible to trust Eisenhower's statement in the August report . . .

The preventable deaths were catastrophically high for many weeks in the camps controlled by Eisenhower's Army, but not in these same camps once they were taken over by Captain Julien. Julien reduced the death rates in one of his Advanced Section camps, Dietersheim, from a very high level in July to zero within a couple of weeks, by taking the necessary sanitary measures and calling for help from civilian Germans nearby.

To avert most of the disaster, all the Army in Germany had to do was to reduce crowding, pipe in clean water, allow the prisoners a few primitive materials to clean up the camps and distribute tents.38 As soon as General Clark in Austria found out about the disastrous conditions at Ebensee, he ordered them to be eliminated although he doubted he had any right to do it. Nothing was easier than to call in civilian help as Captain Julien did, and allow the Red Cross, the Quakers and others to come in and help. In Eisenhower's command, almost none of this was done, nearly all was forbidden.

The average issue of rations to rows in the enclosures of the U.S. Army on June 2 was to only 54 percent of the number of men reported to be in the cages, which actually contained far more than the reported number. History of the Quartermaster Corps in the ETO, p. 335, NARS, Suitland, Md. By the middle of June, the army was feeding about 2,900,000 U.S. military, plus about 650,000 in a mixed bag of civilians, French Moslems and Russians. The prisoner strength on the ration list at that point was shown as only 1,421,559, although the SHAEF G3 report showed over 2,300,000 "on hand" in addition to another million left unreported (see Chapter 5). Thus the 2,000 calories per day ration which Eisenhower told Churchill that the POWs were getting was, if spread over the whole 3,300,000 on hand, about 840 calories per day. Then it was reduced.

Among those initially seeking a stern peace stood Eisenhower, who wrote to his wife, Mamie, in late 1944 that "the German is a beast," exclaiming, "God, I hate the Germans!" Eisenhower favoured the destruction of German war-making ability, war-crimes trials, and the concept of "collective guilt" for all Germans

In 1946, the army, including Chief of Staff Eisenhower, opposed diplomatic maneuvers toward a joint US-British trusteeship in Palestine. "Neither the U.S. nor the U.S.S.R. should be included"; certainly the United States must not commit to sending American forces there . . . But to the dismay of probably all senior offices, in October Truman called for immediate immigration of 100,000 Jews into Palestine and an eventual Jewish state. Papers of Dwight D. Eisenhower, vol. 8, pp. 1137-1138, 1778, ibid, p. 378:97>

The great Western governments had fallen, under "irresistible pressure", into a nerveless captivity, and Britain and America had ceased, anyway for the time, to be sovereign nations. At length the British government, in despair, referred the problem of Palestine to the new organization in New York called "the United Nations" (which had as little right to dispose of Palestine as the League of Nations before it).

Trail of the SerpentDelegates from Haiti, Liberia, Honduras and other parts of "the free world" thronged to Lake Success, a forlorn, suburban pond outside New York. There was a hissing in the world at this time and from the parent UNO bodies called COBSRA, UNRRA, UNESCO uncoiled. On this particular day something called UNSCOP (United Nations Special Committee on Palestine) rendered to UNO its report recommending "the partition of Palestine". Dr. Weizmann (though deposed by the Zionist Organization for his warnings against terrorism) was once more the chief authority heard by UNSCOP in Jerusalem, and then quickly returned to New York where, in October and November of 1947, he dominated the hidden scene as lobbyist supreme. "Irresistible pressure" operated with relentless force. The delegates whom the public masses saw on the moving-picture screens were puppets; the great play was all behind the curtain and in that, Chesterton's "real world", of which the multitude saw nothing, two great operations were in progress, by means of which the fate of Palestine was settled far from the debating halls of the United Nations. First, hundreds of thousands of Jews from Russia and Eastern Europe were being smuggled across Western Europe to invade Palestine (there were only about 600,000 Jews in Germany in 1939 -Ed). Second, the approach of an American presidential election was being used by the Zionists as a means to set the rival parties there bidding against each other for Zionist support, and thus to ensure that the decisive American vote in the United Nations would be cast for the invasion (of Palestine -Ed)"

In each case, and as in the preceding three decades, men arose who strove to disentangle their countries from its consequences. The secret convoying of the Eastern Jews across Western Europe was revealed by a British general, Sir Frederick Morgan (to whose work in planning the invasion of Normandy General Eisenhower's book pays tribute). When the fighting ended General Morgan was lent by the British War Office to "UNRRA", the offspring-body of the United Nations which was supposed to "relieve and rehabilitate" the sufferers from the war. General Morgan was put in charge of the most hapless of these (the "displaced persons") and found that "UNRRA", which cost the American and British taxpayer much money, was being used as an umbrella to cover the mass-movement of (living) Jews from the eastern area to Palestine. These people were not "displaced persons". Their native countries had been "liberated" by the Red Armies and they were able to live in them, their welfare ensured by the special law against "anti-Semitism" which all these communized countries received from their Communist overlord. They had not been "driven from Germany", where they had never lived. In fact, these were, once more, the Ostjuden, the Chazars, being driven by their Talmudic masters to a new land for a conspiratorial purpose.

Trail of the SerpentBrother Branham said, "Remember the Jewish people was declared a nation [at Lake Success by the UNSCOP Committee on April, May 6 (UN docs. A/C.I/P.V.46-57 (May 6-13)] on May 6, 1946, and the Angel of the Lord appeared to me on May 7 at Green's Mill, Indiana . . . come into the room where I was at, a Man walking. He didn't have wings; He was just a big man, had a white garment down to His feet. And He said that I was born to pray for sick people. And I told Him I was uneducated, illiterate, and I wasn't able to go. He said I'd be praying for kings and monarchs, and Message around the world, a Message that would bring the second Coming of Christ was near . . . THUS SAITH THE LORD, I said, America made her final decision in 1946. Watch, since then. She's gone, and there's nothing left but judgment and chaos (58-0309, The Handwriting on the Wall, par. 99; 57-0811A, Thy Loving Kindness, par. E17)]. The United States gave Israel's Covenant Land and name to non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Israeli Jews!

One of the leading court historians explained Roosevelt's mendacity as follows: "Franklin Roosevelt repeatedly deceived the American people during the period before Pearl Harbor . . . Yes, December 7, 1941, was "a day of infamy." . . . centered in Washington . . . There is considerable evidence that indicates that the war, particularly in Europe, could have been won much more quickly had the war been run on conventional lines. Germany could have been attacked through the "soft underbelly" of Europe after Italy surrendered on September 8, 1943. Instead of going straight for Germany's heart, the Allied High Command, under the direction of General Eisenhower (a protege of George C. Marshall who had been responsible, with others, for withholding news of the planned Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor from our commanders in Hawaii), withdrew much of the heavy equipment from the war front and began to turn the British Isles into a huge armed fortress. For the next nine months the British and American air forces pounded away at the centers of German industry. Many German cities were also reduced to piles of rubble. Very little action took place on the ground, in spite of the fact that many of the allied commanders urged the political leaders to launch a massive assault on Germany from the south and west.

What was the motivation for the refusal of the civilian leaders to reject such a logical plan? The author believes that they clearly understood that such an offensive would have resulted in a clearcut victory for the American and British armies and the occupation of all of Germany and all of Eastern Europe. Such a victory would have defeated the real plans of the Insiders. The real powers behind the scenes stalled for time and concentrated on two main goals—the destruction of Germany by bombing and the building up of the Communist forces in Russia. Only when the Communists, with a colossal infusion of American supplies and war materiel, began to get the upper hand over the Germans, did the Allies stage their Normandy invasion, and start their slow and very halting push towards the heart of Germany.

"So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes . . ." History records that General Eisenhower, the Supreme Commander in Europe, and those who were behind him on the Washington scene, continually made "mistakes" and "blunders" which invariably helped the Russians. Eisenhower stopped the Allied forces (which had invaded from Italy) from crossing the Po Valley, then opened up another front in France. This move gave Stalin more time in which to work his way West and also opened up the Balkans for invasion by the Russians when the time came.

Shortly after the Allies reached Germany from the West, Eisenhower ordered a halt to the advance. As the Russians advanced from the East to central Germany, Eisenhower refused German attempts to surrender. It took another three weeks of brutal fighting for the Communist hordes to break through German defenses and reach Berlin. Can there be any doubt that it was all planned that way? nl1335.htm

Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full- time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

Bible Believers' Church
Gunnedah NSW
Australia 2380
 
e-mail Bible Believers
URL Bible Believers' Website
Subscribe   Unsubscribe